{"id":343,"date":"2026-06-02T18:40:18","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T18:40:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343"},"modified":"2026-06-02T18:40:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T18:40:18","slug":"supreme-court-ruling-the-latest-in-history-of-diminishing-minority-voting-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Divided along ideological lines, the U.S. Supreme Court on April 29, 2026, issued a a provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965. That provision, known as Section 2, prohibited any discriminatory voting practice or election rule that results in less opportunity for minority groups to exercise their political clout.<\/p>\n

Read more TMZ descends on Washington in a test of whether tabloid tactics can serve the public\u00a0interest<\/a><\/p>\n

In her dissent on the ruling, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that it is the \u201clatest chapter in the majority\u2019s now-completed demolition of the Voting Rights Act.\u201d<\/p>\n

The decision in the case known as struck down a Louisiana voting district drawn to consolidate Black voters into a district where they would be the majority. The court\u2019s conservative majority deemed the drawing of the district an unconstitutional gerrymander.<\/p>\n

That, wrote Kagan, will \u201csystematically dilute minority citizens\u2019 voting power.\u201d<\/p>\n

I\u2019m a historian of racial formation and electoral and cultural politics in the U.S. I see this decision by the nation\u2019s highest court as the latest in a long line of successful attempts, by both state and federal authorities, to limit the political power of Black Americans and, most recently, to reverse the gains they won in two periods of civil rights advancement.<\/p>\n

Etching away at voting rights<\/h2>\n

Back in 2013, the Supreme Court tossed out a key provision of the Voting Rights Act regarding federal oversight of elections. <\/p>\n

In the Louisiana v. Callais case, the court seemed ready to abolish Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.<\/p>\n

While the conservative majority in Louisiana v. Callais did not explicitly strike down Section 2, the ruling appears likely to nonetheless open the floodgates for widespread vote dilution by allowing primarily Southern state legislatures to redraw political districts, weakening the voting power of racial minorities.<\/p>\n

The case was brought by a group of Louisiana citizens who declared that the federal mandate under Section 2 to draw a second majority-Black district violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment and thus served as an unconstitutional act of racial gerrymandering.<\/p>\n

Initially designed to enshrine federal civil rights protections for freed people facing a battery of discriminatory \u201cBlack Codes\u201d in the postbellum South, the 14th Amendment\u2019s equal protection clause has been the foundation of the nation\u2019s modern rights-based legal order, ensuring that all U.S. citizens are treated fairly and preventing the government from engaging in explicit discrimination.<\/p>\n

The cornerstone of the nation\u2019s \u201csecond founding,\u201d the Reconstruction-era amendments to the Constitution, including the 14th Amendment, created the first cohort of Black elected officials.<\/p>\n

As I highlight in my new book \u201cRequiem for Reconstruction,\u201d the struggle over the nation\u2019s second founding not only highlights how generational political progress can be reversed but also provides a lens into the specific historical origins of racial gerrymandering in the United States.<\/p>\n

Without understanding this history \u2013 and the forces that unraveled Reconstruction\u2019s initial promise of greater racial justice \u2013 we cannot fully comprehend the roots of those forces that are reshaping our contemporary political landscape in a way that I believe subverts the true intentions of the Constitution.\n<\/p>\n

The long history of gerrymandering<\/h2>\n

Political gerrymandering, or shaping political boundaries to benefit a particular party, has been considered constitutional since the nation\u2019s 18th-century founding, but racial gerrymandering is a practice with roots in the post-Civil War era. <\/p>\n

Expanding beyond the practice of redrawing district lines after each decennial census, late 19th-century Democratic state legislatures built on the earlier cartographic practice to create a litany of so-called Black districts across the postbellum South.<\/p>\n

Read more How out\u2011of\u2011work fishermen saved the American\u00a0Revolution<\/a><\/p>\n

The nation\u2019s first wave of racial gerrymandering emerged as a response to the political gains Southern Black voters made during the administration of President Ulysses S. Grant in the 1870s. Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina and Louisiana all elected Black congressmen during that decade. During the 42nd Congress, which met from 1871 to 1873, South Carolina sent Black men to the House from three of its four districts.<\/p>\n

Initially, the white Democrats who ruled the South responded to the rise of Black political power by crafting racist narratives that insinuated that the emergence of Black voters and Black officeholders was a corruption of the proper political order. These attacks often provided a larger cultural pretext for the campaigns of extralegal political violence that terrorized Black voters in the South, assassinated political leaders, and marred the integrity of several of the region\u2019s major elections.<\/p>\n

Election changes<\/h2>\n

Following these pogroms during the 1870s, southern legislatures began seeking legal remedies to make permanent the counterrevolution of \u201cRedemption,\u201d which sought to undo Reconstruction\u2019s advancement of political equality. A generation before the Jim Crow legal order of segregation and discrimination was established, southern political leaders began to disfranchise Black voters through racial gerrymandering.<\/p>\n

These newly created Black districts gained notoriety for their cartographic absurdity. In Mississippi, a shoestring-shaped district was created to snake and swerve alongside the state\u2019s famous river. North Carolina created the \u201cBlack Second\u201d to concentrate its African American voters to a single district. Alabama\u2019s \u201cBlack Fourth\u201d did similar work, leaving African American voters only one possible district in which they could affect the outcome in the state\u2019s central Black Belt.<\/p>\n

South Carolina\u2019s \u201cBlack Seventh\u201d was perhaps the most notorious of these acts of Reconstruction-era gerrymandering. The district \u201csliced through county lines and ducked around Charleston back alleys\u201d \u2013 anticipating the current trend of sophisticated, computer-targeted political redistricting.<\/p>\n

Possessing 30,000 more voters than the next largest congressional district in the state, South Carolina\u2019s Seventh District radically transformed the state\u2019s political landscape by making it impossible for its Black-majority to exercise any influence on national politics, except for the single racially gerrymandered district.<\/p>\n

Although federal courts during the late 19th century remained painfully silent on the constitutionality of these antidemocratic measures, contemporary observers saw these redistricting efforts as more than a simple act of seeking partisan advantage. <\/p>\n

\u201cIt was the high-water mark of political ingenuity coupled with rascality, and the merits of its appellation,\u201d observed who represented South Carolina\u2019s 7th District.<\/p>\n

Racial gerrymandering in recent times<\/h2>\n

The political gains of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, sometimes called the \u201cSecond Reconstruction,\u201d were made tangible by the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The law revived the postbellum 15th Amendment, which prevented states from creating voting restrictions based on race. That amendment had been made a dead letter by Jim Crow state legislatures and an acquiescent Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

In contrast to the post-Civil War struggle, the Second Reconstruction had the firm support of the federal courts. The Supreme Court affirmed the principal of \u201cone person, one vote\u201d in its 1962 Baker v. Carr and 1964 Reynolds v. Sims decisions \u2013 upending the Solid South\u2019s landscape of political districts that had long been marked by sparsely populated Democratic districts controlled by rural elites.<\/p>\n

The Voting Rights Act gave the federal government oversight over any changes in voting policy that might affect historically marginalized groups. Since passage of the 1965 law and its subsequent revisions, racial gerrymandering has largely served the purpose of creating districts that preserve and amplify the political representation of historically marginalized groups.<\/p>\n

This generational work is being undone by the current Supreme Court with its ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. <\/p>\n

Read more Democrats don\u2019t get why they\u2019ve lost most working class\u00a0voters<\/a><\/p>\n

This is an updated version of an article originally published on Feb 3, 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling that a Black-majority voting district in Louisiana is unconstitutional adds to a long and dismal history of government attempts to limit the power of minority voters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":342,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[315],"tags":[341,1087,1088,324,322,1086,1085,318,436],"class_list":["post-343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-14th-amendment","tag-elena-kagan","tag-equal-protection-clause","tag-louisiana-v-callais","tag-racial-gerrymandering","tag-reconstruction","tag-samuel-alito","tag-us-supreme-court","tag-voting-rights-act"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights - Pro Relocation Team<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights - Pro Relocation Team\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling that a Black-majority voting district in Louisiana is unconstitutional adds to a long and dismal history of government attempts to limit the power of minority voters.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pro Relocation Team\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-02T18:40:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/97a31525c78054101e02d9350324fbf9\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-02T18:40:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343\"},\"wordCount\":1250,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif\",\"keywords\":[\"14th Amendment\",\"Elena Kagan\",\"Equal Protection Clause\",\"Louisiana v. Callais\",\"Racial gerrymandering\",\"Reconstruction\",\"Samuel Alito\",\"US Supreme Court\",\"Voting Rights Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights - Pro Relocation Team\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-02T18:40:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/97a31525c78054101e02d9350324fbf9\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif\",\"width\":1356,\"height\":668},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?p=343#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Pro Relocation Team\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/97a31525c78054101e02d9350324fbf9\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/prorelocationteam.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights - Pro Relocation Team","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights - Pro Relocation Team","og_description":"The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling that a Black-majority voting district in Louisiana is unconstitutional adds to a long and dismal history of government attempts to limit the power of minority voters.","og_url":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343","og_site_name":"Pro Relocation Team","article_published_time":"2026-06-02T18:40:18+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/#\/schema\/person\/97a31525c78054101e02d9350324fbf9"},"headline":"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights","datePublished":"2026-06-02T18:40:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343"},"wordCount":1250,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif","keywords":["14th Amendment","Elena Kagan","Equal Protection Clause","Louisiana v. Callais","Racial gerrymandering","Reconstruction","Samuel Alito","US Supreme Court","Voting Rights Act"],"articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343","url":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343","name":"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights - Pro Relocation Team","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif","datePublished":"2026-06-02T18:40:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/#\/schema\/person\/97a31525c78054101e02d9350324fbf9"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/250e97a3a4d004c6aab49ba1301c65e1.avif","width":1356,"height":668},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?p=343#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court ruling: The latest in history of diminishing minority voting\u00a0rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/","name":"Pro Relocation Team","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/#\/schema\/person\/97a31525c78054101e02d9350324fbf9","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/prorelocationteam.com"],"url":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prorelocationteam.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}